Home      Contact      Index      FAQ's      Leave      Case Law      Purchase
Unjustified dismissal for computer pornography

A Wellington man's dismissal for having pornography on his work computer was unjustified, the Employment Relations Authority has held.

The dismissal occurred after the ANZ bank ran a new automated scanning system designed to find pornography and other objectionable material on its computer systems. The Bank had an established zero tolerance policy, and the first scan in Auckland resulted in the dismissal of one worker for breaching it.

Shortly afterwards, the Bank issued a memo to all staff advising them of the dismissal, and reiterating the zero tolerance policy. It immediately began a scan of its Wellington servers.

The scan revealed that three other staff members had pornography on their computers, including Christopher Bingham. Mr Bingham was called to a meeting and asked to explain. He denied all knowledge of the material and said that the picture viewer on his computer was not working. As a result, he could not view incoming emails, so he saved them to his inbox so he could read them later. However, he had not been able to do this. He also said that other staff knew his password and used his computer, but that he did not think anyone would have saved the pornography on it.

The Bank adjourned the meeting and bank executive, Colin MacDonald, accessed Mr Bingham's computer. He discovered that the pornographic files identified by the scan had been deleted. He was also unable to operate the picture viewer as there was no jpg file stored on the computer. He concluded that the computer was a standard build and there was no reason why the picture viewer should not be working. Mr MacDonald reconvened the meeting and, after advising Mr Bingham of his conclusions, summarily dismissed him.

Mr MacDonald then met with staff and advised them that the Bank had dismissed three of their colleagues for having objectionable material on their work computers. He told them that if they had similar material on their computers, then they should delete it. He confirmed that the Bank would not search its back up files for any such material, nor would it discipline anyone who deleted it from their system immediately after the meeting.

Mr Bingham brought an unjustified dismissal claim against the Bank, and the Employment Relations Authority upheld his claim.

The Bank's investigation was seriously defective and Mr Bingham had been disadvantaged by disparity of treatment, Authority member Denis Asher said.

The bank did not properly check Mr Bingham's claim that his picture viewer was not working. While the picture viewer could not be properly tested because the jpg file appeared to have been deleted, another jpg file should have been transferred to his computer so that testing could occur.

The bank also failed to investigate whether other staff could have stored the pornography on Mr Bingham's PC, particularly as some of them knew his password. It had also subjected him to disparate treatment by dismissing him and immediately afterwards, and while the scan was still underway, giving other staff the opportunity to delete offending material from their computers without fear of disciplinary action being taken against them. Mr Bingham should have been given the same opportunity, the Authority said.

The Authority awarded Mr Bingham 3 months lost wages plus $3000 compensation for humiliation and distress.


More on Termination & Dismissal
  An employer's rights: Surfing all the day   Driver lost license
  Dealing with absent employees   Importance of procedural fairness
  Must consult in redundancy dismissals   Dismissal must be procedurally fair
  Misconduct discovered after dismissal   Another procedural fairness example
  Dismissed for benefit fraud   Terminated before started
  The danger of secret witnesses   Expired employment contract
  Cannot intimidate employer   Cannot rely on police enquiry
  Reasonable notice of redundancy   Contractural obligation must be met
  Reinstatement and workplace democracy   Employment and criminal investigation
  Attack not always good defence   Dismissal of persons in authority
  Employee responds by going on offensive   Legality of secret video surveillance
  ERA classifies contractor as employee   Redundancy law unchanged by ERA
  Loss of use of company car   Significant difference
  Resolution of criminal charges   Redundancy and changed hours
  Discrimination for being non Asian   Cannot take retaliatory action
  Failing to meet sales targets   Misconduct outside of work
  Abuse of Internet & Email   Suicide and communication
  Redundancy definition   Unjustified dismissal for pornography
  Abandonment of employment  

More on Employment Agreements

  Employee trial periods   Can change pay frequency if properly managed
  More on secret video cameras   Appeal Court decision on harsh and oppressive contracts
  When is an employment relationship formed?   Employment contracts must be negotiated - they cannot just be presented
  Employer can still be bound by oral agreements   Discrimination for being on collective employment contract
  Common problems with employment agreements   Cannot limit remedies for personal grievances
  Take care when preparing employment agreements   Cannot dismiss without reason even if written in agreement
  Importance of disclosing correct employer   Can a collective employment contract negotiated with union members be applied to non union members?
  Disputes resolution procedure must be included in staff agreement   Employee must disclose information at interview only if asked
  Renegotiation of employment contract on sale of business   Cannot require all employees to apply for new positions
  Expired contracts continue with same terms and conditions   What an offer of employment might look like
  Alphabetical Index   Case Law Back to top
This article originally written by Alan Cressey the copyright of which is owned by The Evening Post
Copyright © 1985 - 2010 Ace Payroll
Feedback? E-Mail Us!
Call Toll Free
0800 223 729
Updated: 31st March 2010
Published: 20th June 2002
Back to top